As I have been reading the book Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology: The Digital Revolution and Schooling in America, Collins and Halverson have been schooling me in the advantages of incorporating technology in the classroom. One specific point they have made is the fact that school has become an information source that doesn't apply as much to the real world as it has evolved over the years. They discussed a poll they took with Harvard students, asking them what they knew about the moon, its phases, and the seasons. Only 1-3 students (out of 24) knew the correct answers, yet these are facts students are taught in elementary school. Their point? In today's world, we need to make the best use of our time in the classroom, teaching students things that they actually need to survive and prosper in our evolving world.
Not only do Collins and Halverson discuss the importance of life application in the classroom, but they describe the endless possibilities that technology has to offer teachers and students. It was interesting to read about "just-in-time learning" and "customization" because both of these concepts correlate directly with the concept of differentiation, which we are taught is one of, if not the most, important ideas on which to base our teaching. Just-in-time learning describes the process of searching for specific information that we need, as individuals, in order to know in order to react to a situation or accomplish a task. Every student is different, so using technology to fit specific needs is both helpful and somewhat essential for each individual to grow and learn in their own way. Customization is similar to this concept in that it we have the ability to customize what each student desires and needs to learn. Personalization and differentiation are difficult tasks for teachers to address with classes of fifteen to thirty students, but technology can be used to assess, give feedback, and encourage reflection for specific students when teachers use the proper and adequate computer programs!
Although I agree with a lot of what I have read so far, I will continue to encourage face-to-face interaction with peers because technology cannot replace that entirely. I do not think Collins and Halverson are implying that it substitutes for group work and conversation as a class, but I want to emphasize that technology should not replace reality, and real-life interaction and experience!